Skip to main content
low cultureVERIFIED

UK children’s author, actor Walliams named as subject of sexual allegations by media

Verified: 28 outlets in 14 countries have reported this story since Nov 10, 3 of them from the United Kingdom.

📍 United Kingdom, GB·🕐 32m ago·28 outlets

LONDON — Two media groups named British comedian and bestselling children’s author David Walliams on Tuesday as the…

How sure are we

✓ Verified · 28 outlets

Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.

How we count · Check a link someone shared

Who reported it

The story so far · 33 reports · · 14 countries✓ Verified Nov 10, 2:41 PM UTC

3 outlets from the United Kingdom, where the story is: AOL, Daily Mail, The Guardian · how we count

  1. Nov 10, 1:00 PM UTCFirst report
    Who Is David Walliams, the UK Entertainer Accused of Sexual Misconduct?nytimes.com ↗
  2. Nov 10, 1:00 PM UTC+0 min
    David Walliams, UK Celebrity, Is Accused of Sexual Misconductnytimes.com (again) ↗
  3. Nov 10, 2:41 PM UTC+2 h
    British children's author David Walliams accused of sexual misconductgoskagit.com ↗
  4. Nov 11, 4:03 AM UTC+15 h
    Little Britain Star David Walliams Accused Of Sexual Misconductpedestrian.tv ↗
  5. Nov 11, 8:54 AM UTC+20 h
    Jonathan Ross ‘horrified’ by David Walliams and Russell Brand revelationstheguardian.com (again) ↗
  6. Nov 11, 9:56 AM UTC+21 h
    Inside Jonathan Ross' friendship with Russell Brand and David Walliamsexpress.co.uk ↗
  7. Nov 11, 10:34 AM UTC+22 h· you’re reading this
    UK children’s author, actor Walliams named as subject of sexual allegations by mediabworldonline.com ↗
Location
Verification Log1
cross checkconfirmed90%

[Claude] Report 2 is a near-identical wire version of the same story about media naming Walliams over sexual misconduct allegations, with no conflicting facts.

32m ago
Powered by WorldPulse Verification Engine
Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

No discussion yet — be the first to add context.

Reliability
89%

Very high · How we score this

Risk Score
low risk