Skip to main content
low cultureVERIFIED🔥 VIRAL

British children's author David Walliams accused of sexual misconduct

Verified: 28 outlets in 14 countries have reported this story since Nov 10, 3 of them from the United Kingdom.

📍 London, GB·🕐 20h ago·28 outlets

How sure are we

✓ Verified · 28 outlets

Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.

How we count · Check a link someone shared

Who reported it

The story so far · 33 reports · · 14 countries✓ Verified Nov 10, 2:41 PM UTC

3 outlets from the United Kingdom, where the story is: AOL, Daily Mail, The Guardian · how we count

  1. Nov 10, 1:00 PM UTCFirst report
    Who Is David Walliams, the UK Entertainer Accused of Sexual Misconduct?nytimes.com ↗
  2. Nov 10, 1:00 PM UTC+0 min
    David Walliams, UK Celebrity, Is Accused of Sexual Misconductnytimes.com (again) ↗
  3. Nov 10, 2:41 PM UTC+2 h· you’re reading this
    British children's author David Walliams accused of sexual misconductgoskagit.com ↗
  4. Nov 11, 4:03 AM UTC+15 h
    Little Britain Star David Walliams Accused Of Sexual Misconductpedestrian.tv ↗
  5. Nov 11, 8:54 AM UTC+20 h
    Jonathan Ross ‘horrified’ by David Walliams and Russell Brand revelationstheguardian.com (again) ↗
  6. Nov 11, 9:56 AM UTC+21 h
    Inside Jonathan Ross' friendship with Russell Brand and David Walliamsexpress.co.uk ↗
  7. Nov 11, 10:34 AM UTC+22 h
    UK children’s author, actor Walliams named as subject of sexual allegations by mediabworldonline.com ↗
Location
Verification Log2
cross checkconfirmed90%

[Claude] All three reports cover the same misconduct allegations against David Walliams and none contradicts Report 1's facts.

10h ago
cross checkconfirmed90%

[Claude] Both other reports cover the same accusations against Walliams, and neither conflicts with Report 1's facts.

20h ago
Powered by WorldPulse Verification Engine
Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

No discussion yet — be the first to add context.

Reliability
98%

Very high · How we score this

Risk Score
low risk