medium technologyVERIFIED
Brazil electoral court fines Meta, sees no deliberate election bias
Verified: 2 outlets in 2 countries have reported this story since Nov 11.
📍 Brazil, BR·🕐 18m ago·2 outlets
How sure are we
✓ Verified · 2 outlets
Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.
Who reported it
The story so far · 2 reports · · 2 countries✓ Verified Nov 11, 12:26 PM UTC
- Nov 11, 4:07 AM UTCFirst reportBrazil electoral court fines Meta $1.3 million in Lula-Bolsonaro spatgulfnews.com ↗
- Nov 11, 12:26 PM UTC+8 h· you’re reading thisBrazil electoral court fines Meta, sees no deliberate election biaschannelnewsasia.com ↗
- Severity rose to medium
- Verified: a second independent outlet reported itNov 11, 12:26 PM UTC · +8 h
Location
Verification Log1
cross checkconfirmed90%
[Claude] Both reports cover the same Brazilian electoral court fine on Meta, and the $1.3 million figure is an added detail that doesn't contradict Report 1.
18m agoPowered by WorldPulse Verification Engine
Reliability
Reliability ScoreVery high
88%Independent outlets2
Statusverified
AI checknone yet
Community flags0
Score bands
Very high80–100%
A highly rated outlet, or several independent outletsHigh60–79%
One well-rated outlet so farModerate40–59%
A lower-rated or state-run outlet, or one report of something seriousLow20–39%
A low-rated outlet on a serious or sensitive storyVery low0–19%
Treat it as unconfirmedWhat moves the score
◎
Outlet ratingThe outlet’s rating in WorldPulse’s list of sources starts the score
⇄
Independent outletsEach further outlet that reports the story closes 40% of the gap to 98%
±
Report detailsA few points either way: a summary and a place add a little; state-run outlets on conflict, politics or security, and single reports marked high or critical, lose some
Not in the score: AI checks and reader flags. Verified is separate: two or more independent outlets and a score of at least 65%.
Very high · How we score this
Risk Score
medium risk