medium electionsVERIFIED
Some Alberta referendum questions flip to ‘no’ as count continues
🕐 4d ago·2 outlets
In questions such as choosing their own judges, abolishing the Senate and changing the Constitution to boost provincial rights, the ‘no’ side pulls ahead
How sure are we
✓ Verified · 2 outlets
Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.
Who reported it
Verification Log2
cross checkconfirmed90%
[Claude] Report 2 covers the same ongoing Alberta referendum ballot count that Report 1 describes, and the two do not conflict.
3d agocorroborationconfirmed80%
Also reported by calgaryherald.com (found in GDELT's list of news articles)
3d agoPowered by WorldPulse Verification Engine
Reliability
Reliability ScoreVery high
91%Independent outlets2
Statusverified
AI checknone yet
Community flags0
Score bands
Very high80–100%
A highly rated outlet, or several independent outletsHigh60–79%
One well-rated outlet so farModerate40–59%
A lower-rated or state-run outlet, or one report of something seriousLow20–39%
A low-rated outlet on a serious or sensitive storyVery low0–19%
Treat it as unconfirmedWhat moves the score
◎
Outlet ratingThe outlet’s rating in WorldPulse’s list of sources starts the score
⇄
Independent outletsEach further outlet that reports the story closes 40% of the gap to 98%
±
Report detailsA few points either way: a summary and a place add a little; state-run outlets on conflict, politics or security, and single reports marked high or critical, lose some
Not in the score: AI checks and reader flags. Verified is separate: two or more independent outlets and a score of at least 65%.
Very high · How we score this
Risk Score
medium risk