low sportsVERIFIED
Sabalenka apologises for outburst during loss to Svitolina
Verified: 3 outlets in 3 countries have reported this story since Nov 14, 1 of them from Japan.
🕐 31m ago·3 outlets
How sure are we
✓ Verified · 3 outlets
Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.
Who reported it
The story so far · 5 reports · · 4 countries✓ Verified Nov 15, 2:28 AM UTC
1 outlet from Japan, where the story is: Japan Today · how we count
- Nov 14, 10:45 AM UTCFirst reportSabalenka crashes out of season-ending WTA Finals after losing to Svitolinaaljazeera.com ↗
- Nov 14, 11:30 PM UTC+13 hSabalenka apologies for outburst during loss to Svitolinachannelnewsasia.com ↗
- Nov 15, 2:28 AM UTC+16 hSabalenka apologizes for on-court outburst in WTA Finals loss to Svitolinajapantoday.com ↗
- Verified: a second independent outlet reported itNov 15, 2:28 AM UTC · +16 h
- Nov 15, 3:25 AM UTC+17 h· you’re reading thisSabalenka apologises for outburst during loss to Svitolinachannelnewsasia.com (again) ↗
- Nov 15, 3:57 AM UTC+17 hSabalenka sorry for outburst in Svitolina defeatnst.com.my ↗
Verification Log1
cross checkconfirmed90%
[Claude] Both reports cover Sabalenka's apology for her on-court outburst in the loss to Svitolina, with no conflicting facts.
31m agoPowered by WorldPulse Verification Engine
Reliability
Reliability ScoreVery high
89%Independent outlets2
Statusverified
AI checknone yet
Community flags0
Score bands
Very high80–100%
A highly rated outlet, or several independent outletsHigh60–79%
One well-rated outlet so farModerate40–59%
A lower-rated or state-run outlet, or one report of something seriousLow20–39%
A low-rated outlet on a serious or sensitive storyVery low0–19%
Treat it as unconfirmedWhat moves the score
◎
Outlet ratingThe outlet’s rating in WorldPulse’s list of sources starts the score
⇄
Independent outletsEach further outlet that reports the story closes 40% of the gap to 98%
±
Report detailsA few points either way: a summary and a place add a little; state-run outlets on conflict, politics or security, and single reports marked high or critical, lose some
Not in the score: AI checks and reader flags. Verified is separate: two or more independent outlets and a score of at least 65%.
Very high · How we score this
Risk Score
low risk