low scienceVERIFIED
BRICS youth innovators call for enhanced sci-tech cooperation
Verified: 2 outlets have reported this story since Nov 12, 1 of them from China.
📍 Xiamen, CN·🕐 42m ago·2 outlets
How sure are we
✓ Verified · 2 outlets
Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.
Who reported it
The story so far · 2 reports · ✓ Verified Nov 13, 3:12 AM UTC
1 outlet from China, where the story is: Xinhua · how we count
- Nov 12, 6:28 PM UTCFirst reportChina Focus: BRICS youth innovators call for enhanced sci-tech cooperationenglish.news.cn ↗
- Nov 13, 3:12 AM UTC+9 h· you’re reading thisBRICS youth innovators call for enhanced sci-tech cooperationsierraleonetimes.com ↗
- Verified: a second independent outlet reported itNov 13, 3:12 AM UTC · +9 h
Location
Verification Log1
cross checkconfirmed90%
[Claude] Report 2 is the same story under a different headline ("China Focus:" prefix), so it covers the same event and does not conflict with Report 1.
42m agoPowered by WorldPulse Verification Engine
Reliability
Reliability ScoreVery high
80%Independent outlets2
Statusverified
AI checknone yet
Community flags0
Score bands
Very high80–100%
A highly rated outlet, or several independent outletsHigh60–79%
One well-rated outlet so farModerate40–59%
A lower-rated or state-run outlet, or one report of something seriousLow20–39%
A low-rated outlet on a serious or sensitive storyVery low0–19%
Treat it as unconfirmedWhat moves the score
◎
Outlet ratingThe outlet’s rating in WorldPulse’s list of sources starts the score
⇄
Independent outletsEach further outlet that reports the story closes 40% of the gap to 98%
±
Report detailsA few points either way: a summary and a place add a little; state-run outlets on conflict, politics or security, and single reports marked high or critical, lose some
Not in the score: AI checks and reader flags. Verified is separate: two or more independent outlets and a score of at least 65%.
Very high · How we score this
Risk Score
low risk