Skip to main content
high securityVERIFIED📡 SPREADING

Ukrainian intelligence services behind car blast in Moscow — Ukraine’s former PM

Verified: 6 outlets in 3 countries have reported this story since Nov 13, 2 of them from Russia.

📍 Moscow, RU·🕐 1h ago·6 outlets

According to Nikolay Azarov, the main motive was Sergey Zavorotny's journalistic activity aimed at exposing the Kiev regime

⚠ A state-run outlet: it may reflect official government positions.

How sure are we

✓ Verified · 6 outlets

Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.

How we count · Check a link someone shared

Who reported it

The story so far · 6 reports · · 3 countries✓ Verified Nov 13, 10:29 AM UTC

2 outlets from Russia, where the story is: TASS, The Moscow Times · how we count

  1. Nov 13, 9:14 AM UTCFirst report
    Former Ukrainian PM’s Aide Seriously Injured in Moscow Car Blast – Reportsthemoscowtimes.com ↗
  2. Nov 13, 9:49 AM UTC+35 min
    Car of former aide to fugitive ex-PM Azarov explodes in Moscow – videopravda.com.ua ↗
  3. Nov 13, 10:13 AM UTC+59 min
    Car explosion in Moscow reportedly injures ex-Azarov press secretarykyivindependent.com ↗
  4. Severity rose to high
  5. Nov 13, 10:29 AM UTC+1 h
    Moscow Car Blast Reportedly Injures Former Azarov Spokesmankyivpost.com ↗
  6. Verified: a second independent outlet reported itNov 13, 10:29 AM UTC · +1 h
  7. Nov 13, 11:59 AM UTC+3 h
    Former Ukrainian PM's aide targeted in Moscow car bombingbignewsnetwork.com ↗
  8. Nov 13, 2:18 PM UTC+5 h· you’re reading this
    Ukrainian intelligence services behind car blast in Moscow — Ukraine’s former PMtass.com ↗
Location
Verification Log1
cross checkconfirmed90%

[Claude] All three other reports cover the same Moscow car blast injuring Sergei Zavorotny, and none contradicts Report 1's details.

1h ago
Powered by WorldPulse Verification Engine
Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

No discussion yet — be the first to add context.

Reliability
84%

Very high · How we score this

Risk Score
high risk