Skip to main content
low electionsVERIFIED

CHRDI Under Fire for Singling Out Chericoco as APC Flagbearer Poll Controversy Deepens

Verified: 2 outlets have reported this story since Nov 10, 2 of them from Sierra Leone.

📍 Freetown, Sierra Leone, SL·🕐 1h ago·2 outlets

The Campaign for Human Rights and Development International (CHRDI) has come under scrutiny following its decision to disqualify the All People’s Congress (APC) flagbearer opinion poll amid allegations of voting irregularities, with questions emerging over why Hon. Chernor Ramadan Maju Bah, popularly known as Chericoco, was specifically identified in its latest public statement while other… The post CHRDI Under Fire for Singling Out Chericoco as APC Flagbearer Poll Controversy Deepens first appeared on The Calabash Newspaper.

How sure are we

✓ Verified · 2 outlets

Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.

How we count · Check a link someone shared

Who reported it

The story so far · 3 reports · ✓ Verified Nov 11, 11:47 AM UTC

2 outlets from Sierra Leone, where the story is: Sierraloaded, The Calabash Newspaper · how we count

  1. Nov 10, 8:09 AM UTCFirst report
    APC Flagbearer Poll: Chericoco Campaign Team Challenges CHRDI Credibility Over Alleged Irregularitiessierraloaded.sl ↗
  2. Nov 10, 8:21 PM UTC+12 h
    CHRDI Disqualifies APC Flagbearer Poll After Detecting Voting Irregularitiessierraloaded.sl (again) ↗
  3. Nov 11, 11:47 AM UTC+28 h· you’re reading this
    CHRDI Under Fire for Singling Out Chericoco as APC Flagbearer Poll Controversy Deepensthecalabashnewspaper.com ↗
  4. Verified: a second independent outlet reported itNov 11, 11:47 AM UTC · +28 h
Location
Verification Log1
cross checkconfirmed90%

[Claude] Both other reports cover the same CHRDI disqualification of the APC flagbearer poll and the ensuing dispute, with no conflicting facts stated.

1h ago
Powered by WorldPulse Verification Engine
Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

No discussion yet — be the first to add context.

Reliability
81%

Very high · How we score this

Risk Score
low risk