medium disasterVERIFIED
Tempestade Charles. Ponto de situação da Proteção Civil
Verified: 2 outlets have reported this story since Nov 11.
🕐 1h ago·2 outlets
No briefing da Proteção Civil, IPMA, APA e ANEPC fizeram o balanço do mau tempo e defenderam a prevenção adotada, sublinhando que a perda de força do vento evitou o pior cenário no país.
How sure are we
✓ Verified · 2 outlets
Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.
Who reported it
The story so far · 2 reports · ✓ Verified Nov 11, 9:44 PM UTC
- Nov 11, 8:45 PM UTCFirst report· you’re reading thisTempestade Charles. Ponto de situação da Proteção Civilobservador.pt ↗
- Nov 11, 9:44 PM UTC+59 minTempestade Charles. Proteção Civil registou mais de 1630 ocorrênciasrtp.pt ↗
- Verified: a second independent outlet reported itNov 11, 9:44 PM UTC · +59 min
Verification Log
No verification data yet
Checks run automatically as new sources are ingested.
Reliability
Reliability ScoreVery high
86%Independent outlets2
Statusverified
AI checknone yet
Community flags0
Score bands
Very high80–100%
A highly rated outlet, or several independent outletsHigh60–79%
One well-rated outlet so farModerate40–59%
A lower-rated or state-run outlet, or one report of something seriousLow20–39%
A low-rated outlet on a serious or sensitive storyVery low0–19%
Treat it as unconfirmedWhat moves the score
◎
Outlet ratingThe outlet’s rating in WorldPulse’s list of sources starts the score
⇄
Independent outletsEach further outlet that reports the story closes 40% of the gap to 98%
±
Report detailsA few points either way: a summary and a place add a little; state-run outlets on conflict, politics or security, and single reports marked high or critical, lose some
Not in the score: AI checks and reader flags. Verified is separate: two or more independent outlets and a score of at least 65%.
Very high · How we score this
Risk Score
medium risk