Skip to main content
low cultureVERIFIED📡 SPREADING

DCU Ends Part 1: James Gunn And Peter Safran Out, Should Skydance Wait?

Verified: 13 outlets in 9 countries have reported this story since Nov 9, 1 of them from the United Arab Emirates.

🕐 23h ago·13 outlets

The exit of James Gunn and Peter Safran leaves DC Studios future plans up in the air. Can the DCU survive, and if so in what form?

How sure are we

✓ Verified · 13 outletsin its last 2 days · 15 since Nov 9

Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.

How we count · Check a link someone shared

Who reported it

The story so far · 17 reports · · 10 countries · 13 in its last 2 days✓ Verified Nov 9, 6:26 PM UTC

1 outlet from the United Arab Emirates, where the story is: The National · how we count

  1. Nov 9, 5:48 PM UTCFirst report
    The James Gunn-Peter Safran era of DC Studios is over after 4 yearsthewrap.com ↗
  2. Nov 9, 6:26 PM UTC+38 min
    Terremoto en DC Studios: Salen James Gunn y Peter Safran, entra exproductor de Marvelcooperativa.cl ↗
  3. Severity rose to medium
  4. Verified: a second independent outlet reported itNov 9, 6:26 PM UTC · +38 min
  5. Nov 9, 6:53 PM UTC+1 h
    James Gunn y Peter Safran dejan la dirección de DC Studios: Skydance elige a un exejecutivo de Marvel como reemplazorpp.pe ↗
  6. Nov 10, 11:44 PM UTC+30 h· you’re reading this
    DCU Ends Part 1: James Gunn And Peter Safran Out, Should Skydance Wait?forbes.com (again) ↗
  7. Nov 11, 2:42 AM UTC+33 h
    Golpe en Hollywood: apartan a James Gunn y Peter Safran de DC Studiosgestion.pe ↗
  8. Nov 11, 7:37 PM UTC+2 d
    ‘Lanterns’ Season 2 Was A Long Shot Before James Gunn And Peter Safran’s DC Studios Exitforbes.com (again) ↗
  9. Nov 11, 9:39 PM UTC+2 d
    David Ellison’s Skydance replaces DC Studios bosses James Gunn and Peter Safran with a Marvel veteranfortune.com ↗
Verification Log

No verification data yet

Checks run automatically as new sources are ingested.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

No discussion yet — be the first to add context.

Reliability
93%

Very high · How we score this

Risk Score
low risk