low sportsVERIFIED🔥 VIRAL
Real Madrid apologise to Chinese people over Mbappe's Mao 'dictator' comment
📍 China, CN·🕐 1h ago·44 outlets
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said: "We take seriously the apology that the person has made"
How sure are we
✓ Verified · 44 outlets
Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.
Who reported it
This report
View original source →This report links 15 of the story's 44 outlets
The Hindu· National ↗The Punch· National ↗3News· National ↗The Independent· National ↗Asharq Al-Awsat· International ↗France 24· International ↗Vanguard News· National ↗Al Jazeera· International ↗The Japan Times· National ↗RTÉ· National ↗BusinessDay Nigeria· Specialist ↗Newswire· National ↗ABC News· National ↗The National· National ↗DW· International ↗
Location
Verification Log1
cross checkconfirmed90%
[Claude] All three reports cover the same Mbappe Mao 'dictator' comment and apology, with no conflicting facts.
1h agoPowered by WorldPulse Verification Engine
Reliability
Reliability ScoreVery high
98%Independent outlets15
Statusverified
AI checknone yet
Community flags0
Score bands
Very high80–100%
A highly rated outlet, or several independent outletsHigh60–79%
One well-rated outlet so farModerate40–59%
A lower-rated or state-run outlet, or one report of something seriousLow20–39%
A low-rated outlet on a serious or sensitive storyVery low0–19%
Treat it as unconfirmedWhat moves the score
◎
Outlet ratingThe outlet’s rating in WorldPulse’s list of sources starts the score
⇄
Independent outletsEach further outlet that reports the story closes 40% of the gap to 98%
±
Report detailsA few points either way: a summary and a place add a little; state-run outlets on conflict, politics or security, and single reports marked high or critical, lose some
Not in the score: AI checks and reader flags. Verified is separate: two or more independent outlets and a score of at least 65%.
Very high · How we score this
Risk Score
low risk