Skip to main content
low electionsVERIFIED

Inšpektorat obravnava 46 domnevnih kršitev volilnega molka

Verified: 2 outlets have reported this story since Nov 14, 2 of them from Slovenia.

🕐 1h ago·2 outlets

Dežurna služba ministrstva za notranje zadeve in javno upravo je v času volilnega molka, ki se je pred nedeljskimi lokalnimi volitvami začel v petek opolnoči, danes do 9. ure prejela skupaj 75 obvestil o domnevnih kršitvah volilnega molka. Inšpektorat za notranje zadeve obravnava 46 zadev, pri katerih obstaja sum kršitve.

How sure are we

✓ Verified · 2 outlets

Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.

How we count · Check a link someone shared

Who reported it

The story so far · 5 reports · ✓ Verified Nov 14, 10:06 AM UTC

2 outlets from Slovenia, where the story is: Dnevnik, RTV Slovenija · how we count

  1. Nov 14, 9:05 AM UTCFirst report
    Do 9. ure šest obvestil o domnevnih kršitvah volilnega molkadnevnik.si ↗
  2. Nov 14, 10:06 AM UTC+1 h
    Do 9. ure šest prijav domnevnih kršitev volilnega molkartvslo.si ↗
  3. Verified: a second independent outlet reported itNov 14, 10:06 AM UTC · +1 h
  4. Nov 14, 4:24 PM UTC+7 h
    Do 14.30 ure 17 prijav domnevnih kršitev volilnega molkartvslo.si (again) ↗
  5. Nov 15, 10:12 AM UTC+25 h· you’re reading this
    Inšpektorat obravnava 46 domnevnih kršitev volilnega molkadnevnik.si (again) ↗
  6. Nov 15, 11:44 AM UTC+27 h
    Do 9. ure 75 prijav domnevnih kršitev volilnega molkartvslo.si (again) ↗
Verification Log1
cross checkwarning60%

[Claude] The outlets differ: Report 2 covers the same election-silence violation reports, but gives a count of six reports by 9 a.m. whereas Report 1 gives 75 notifications (46 suspected violations) by the same hour, so the figur

1h ago
Powered by WorldPulse Verification Engine
Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

No discussion yet — be the first to add context.

Reliability
84%

Very high · How we score this

Risk Score
low risk