Skip to main content
low sportsVERIFIED📡 SPREADING

Man Utd hold talks with Pochettino

Verified: 7 outlets in 5 countries have reported this story since Nov 10.

📍 Monaco, MC·🕐 17m ago·7 outlets

A directorial meeting in Monaco will determine Michael Carrick’s future as the Red Devils weigh up a managerial move for the former Spurs coach

How sure are we

✓ Verified · 7 outlets

Two or more outlets reported this story and its reliability score reached 65%, so WorldPulse marks it verified. That means more than one outlet says so, not that it is proven true.

How we count · Check a link someone shared

Who reported it

The story so far · 8 reports · · 5 countries✓ Verified Nov 11, 4:09 AM UTC
  1. Nov 10, 4:59 PM UTCFirst report
    Man United to sack Carrick, Pochettino emerges as potential replacementbusinessday.ng ↗
  2. Nov 10, 4:59 PM UTC+0 min
    Pochettino open to Man United talks as Carrick’s future hangs in balancevanguardngr.com ↗
  3. Nov 11, 4:09 AM UTC+11 h
    Pochettino open to talks for Manchester United managerial gig as cloud looms over Carrick's futuretimesofoman.com ↗
  4. Verified: a second independent outlet reported itNov 11, 4:09 AM UTC · +11 h
  5. Nov 11, 9:32 AM UTC+17 h
    Man Utd open talks with Pochettino about replacing Carrickmyjoyonline.com ↗
  6. Nov 11, 9:41 AM UTC+17 h
    Pochettino in talks to replace Carrick at Man Unitedthearabianstories.com ↗
  7. Nov 11, 10:28 AM UTC+17 h
    Man Utd eye Pochettino as Carrick replacement: Reportsnst.com.my ↗
  8. Nov 11, 10:45 AM UTC+18 h· you’re reading this
    Man Utd hold talks with Pochettinobdnews24.com ↗
  9. Nov 11, 10:57 AM UTC+18 h
    Man Utd open talks with Pochettino over replacing Carrick: reportsnst.com.my (again) ↗
Location
Verification Log1
cross checkconfirmed90%

[Claude] Both reports cover the same Monaco meeting on Carrick's future and the Pochettino talks; Report 2 adds attendee names and the Wednesday date without contradicting Report 1.

17m ago
Powered by WorldPulse Verification Engine
Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

No discussion yet — be the first to add context.

Reliability
96%

Very high · How we score this

Risk Score
low risk